In Brief

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump proposed immediate budget
cuts for several science and health agencies. It includes a $1.2
billion cut from the NIH’s budget, which would disrupt existing
medical research programs.

Budget Cuts

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump proposed an immediate $1.2
billion cut to the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH)
budget for this year. The measure seems to be part of Trump’s
plan to work without an approved budget; as it stands, the
president is working within the framework of
a continuing resolution, which was assigned by Congress
for the 2017 budget year (ending in October).

The Story of How Vaccines Changed the WorldClick to View Full Infographic

The president has already proposed a vague budget plan for
2018 which outlines slashing funds for various science and health
 — including a 20 percent cut on NIH funds. Congress’
December 2016 continuing resolution left the NIH with a $31.6
billion budget.

The NIH isn’t the only agency that might suffer from an
immediate budget cut: the proposal also includes cutting
a$350 million from the National Science
Foundation’s $6.9 billion budget, cutting the Environmental
Protection Agency’s research and development budget by $48
million, a $37 million cut to the Department of Energy’s
science programs budget, and slashing the $101 million budget
of the Teen Pregnancy Prevention program.

The Importance of Research

While approving an actual budget is up to Congress, the
president is responsible for setting up a plan to be reviewed
and approved by the House and Senate. Charles Kieffer,
Democratic staff director on the Senate Appropriations
Committee, told a panel at the Bipartisan Policy
that Trump’s “focus is on cutting science
programs. They are forcing these rob-Peter-to-pay-Paul
decisions that will have consequences for a generation.”

One of the foremost responsibilities of the NIH is
medical research. A 20 percent decrease — roughly $6 billion
— in the NIH’s 2018 budget “would set the agency’s
budget back 15 years, below its 2003 level,” wrote Michael White, a genetics professor
at the Washington University in St. Louis. “Such a drastic
cut would not just reduce the amount of science done by U.S.
scientists — it would harm our scientific workforce and
infrastructure in ways that would take years, if not decades,
to recover from.”

Other experts agree: Clifford Hudis, CEO of the American
Society of Clinical Oncology, thinks that “Cutting the
funding in this way will have devastating and generation-long
effects.” Speaking to NBC News, Hudis explained that
“[medical research] is a fundamental driver of American
economic strength and it is being compromised here. It’s a
jobs program.”

That being said, there are many members of Congress
in support of medical research. David Arons, CEO of the National Brain Tumor
Society, said
that they’re “grateful and encouraged” by
the opposition of members of Congress to Trump’s 2018 budget
plan. “It would be a tremendous disappointment if we backed
away now from all the gains that have been made and all those
that are within reach.”

Like it? Share with your friends!


Your reaction


React with gif

Comments 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note: Your password will be generated automatically and sent to your email address.

Forgot Your Password?

Enter your email address and we'll send you a link you can use to pick a new password.

log in

Become a part of our community!
Don't have an account?
sign up

reset password

Back to
log in

sign up

Join My Viral Wall Community

Back to
log in

Choose post type

News Image List Poll Quiz Video Audio
Choose A Format