Federer Is Sublime, But Is He Really The Greatest Of All Time?

Like millions of others, I was in awe of Roger Federer as he
won his eighth Wimbledon title (and 19th grand slam title
overall) last week. Clearly his opponent, Marin Cilic, was
suffering from stage fright and below his best, but as John
Newcombe observed, much of that was down to the way Federer
dominated with his sheer brilliance. Not even Nadal at his best
would have been able to defeat Federer the way he was playing.

And, not surprisingly, the plaudits have been steadily flowing
from all corners of the media, with journalists eager to
declare him the ‘greatest of all time’.

As someone with a background in tennis, I’m inclined to agree.
Federer’s breathtaking skill on the court is rivaled only by
his reputation as a nice guy off it. However, I can’t help but
notice how often Federer’s G.O.A.T. status is bestowed simply
on the basis of grand slam titles.

Take a look at this list of total men’s grand slam singles
titles published recently:

Roger Federer (SWI): 19
Rafael Nadal (SPA): 15
Pete Sampras (USA): 14
Roy Emerson (AUS): 12
Novak Djokovic (SER): 12
Rod Laver (AUS): 11*
Bjorn Borg (SWE): 11
Bill Tilden (USA): 10

By this measure Federer is clearly the greatest male player —
although the slam numbers aren’t up there with some of the
female greats: Margaret Court’s 24, Serena Williams’ 23 and
Steffi Graf’s 22 singles titles. I’ll leave further comment on
that to Andy Murray.

But, notice that asterisk next to Rod Laver’s tally of 11? That
wasn’t in the article — I added that. And this is what appears
to be continuously overlooked, or perhaps unknown, by so many
people keen to assign the G.O.A.T. mantle.

Every sport has its legends, and nobody really benefits when we
insist on elevating one above all others.

Rod Laver started playing grand slam tournaments in the late
’50s, back when tennis was an amateur sport. Laver won his
first slam at the Australian Open in 1960, followed by
Wimbledon the following year, and then all four in 1962,
becoming only the second male player and third overall to
complete the Grand Slam in singles.

Having achieved seemingly all he could in the amateur game, he
joined the professional circuit established by Jack Kramer,
where he competed against other legends such as Hoad, Rosewell
and Gonzales.

As a result, he was barred from competing in the slams until
professionals were readmitted in 1968, when he won Wimbledon
again. Then, in 1969, he did the unthinkable and completed the
Grand Slam for a second time.

During those five years (1963-67), there were 20 grand slam
tournaments Laver was unable to contest. Given his dominance of
both the amateur game before he left it, and the professional
circuit (he was the first player to amass a million dollars in
prize money), it’s not difficult to imagine that had he
remained an amateur (and, too, those others that turned pro
during this period), he would have won at least another 10
slams, taking his tally into the twenties.


Cricket Australia Has Forgotten That Without The Players
There Is No Game

None of this is to suggest that Federer is not the greatest of
all time. The only way to ascertain that would be to build a
time machine, so we could see him go head to head against the
likes of Laver, Hoad, Rosewell, Gonzales and of course,
McEnroe. And even then there would be numerous caveats, such as
playing surfaces, racquets and equipment technology
complicating the issue.

All I’m asking is that we dispense with this need to single one
person out as ‘the greatest’ of their chosen field, and accept
that while data doesn’t lie, it often doesn’t tell the whole
story either.

Every sport has its legends, and nobody really benefits when we
insist on elevating one above all others. Part of what makes
Federer so likeable is his knowledge of tennis history and his
reverence for those greats that have preceded him. It’s a pity
more sports journalists aren’t as well-versed on the subject.


Like it? Share with your friends!


Your reaction


React with gif

Comments 0

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Federer Is Sublime, But Is He Really The Greatest Of All Time?

Note: Your password will be generated automatically and sent to your email address.

Forgot Your Password?

Enter your email address and we'll send you a link you can use to pick a new password.

log in

Become a part of our community!
Don't have an account?
sign up

reset password

Back to
log in

sign up

Join My Viral Wall Community

Back to
log in

Choose post type

News Image List Poll Quiz Video Audio
Choose A Format